Client experience
Every firm has them, and most principals carry them for years. The reason is rarely economic.
Every advisory firm has them. The client who calls the office four times a week. The one who questions every trade and implements none of the advice. The one who is rude to your staff. The one who pays eleven hundred dollars a year and consumes more attention than a relationship paying twenty times that.
Most principals carry these for years, and the reason is rarely economic. It is that ending a client relationship feels like failure, and nobody was ever taught how to do it.
Before anything else, separate three different problems that feel identical from the inside.
Mispriced. The relationship is fine and the fee does not reflect the work. That is a pricing conversation, not an exit.
Mismatched. They want something you do not do — daily trading, stock picking, constant contact. Nobody is behaving badly; you are simply not the right firm.
Corrosive. Abusive to staff, demands you act outside your process, pressures you toward advice you do not believe in, or repeatedly asks you to document things loosely. This is the only category that is urgent.
For most of the first two categories, repricing solves it without an exit. Either the relationship becomes profitable at a fee that reflects the work, or the client leaves on their own terms and nobody had to have the harder conversation.
That is not a trick. It is the honest position: this level of service costs this much, and here is the alternative if you would rather not pay it.
In person or by phone, never by letter. A client who learns by letter tells the story that way for years.
Frame it as fit, not fault. I do not think we are the right firm for what you need, and I would rather tell you that than keep taking your fee. True, unarguable, and it leaves them their dignity.
Do not itemise grievances. The temptation is enormous and it converts a clean ending into an argument.
Give them somewhere to go. One or two specific referrals to firms that genuinely fit better. This is the difference between being fired and being handed off.
Set a date and help until it. Thirty to sixty days, with the transfer paperwork handled properly. How you behave in the last month is what they remember and repeat.
You have obligations that do not end the moment you decide to part company. Your advisory agreement governs notice and termination. Records must be retained. And you cannot leave a client's portfolio in a state you would not defend simply because the relationship is ending.
Your compliance officer should see the list before you act, not after.
Principals who do this consistently report the same two things. The staff morale effect is larger than expected, because the difficult client was consuming attention everyone could see. And the revenue is replaced faster than feared, because the capacity was real.
The firms that never do it are not being loyal. They are subsidising a small number of relationships with the attention their best clients were paying for.
Questions this did not answer? Ask them directly — that is what the twenty minutes is for.
Book 20 minutes with Kyle